Public servants fighting COVID vaccine mandate go up against unions.

Just over 200 union members are set to go up against their unions in a bid to prove that they failed to represent them or colluded with the government on COVID‑19 vaccine mandates.

Quick! HOT Feature! 1 minute listen!
” I am going to sue them all!”

Full Interview by Victoria’s Rumble Room.

More information here

Two doses of vaccination against COVID-19 was made a condition of employment for B.C. public service employees in November. People who wouldn’t get vaccinated or wouldn’t disclose their vaccination status were put on unpaid leave.

Lawyer Umar Sheikh of Sheikh Law will make the arguments before a Labour Relations Board hearing. A former Health Ministry director of labour relations, Sheikh led a ­successful fight against “vaccinate or mask” flu vaccine policies in 2019 as CEO of the British Columbia Nurses’ Union. Umar Sheikh’s website

“It’s a pretty big labour board case,” Sheikh said. “I’ve dealt with massive union issues and I understand where the unions, in my view, have fallen down here.”

Sheikh will argue failure to represent and collusion under section 12 of the B.C. Labour Relations Code in a hearing on behalf of members belonging to several unions, including the B.C. General Employees’ Union, MoveUP, Unifor, CUPE 873, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. They include B.C. Transit workers and paramedics, among others.

The B.C. Labour Relations Board will be asked to find that the unions failed to represent members and as such award full damages and compensation, including income loss. Sheikh will argue the cases against each union individually, starting with the BCGEU and then proceeding to the national unions. “These will be huge,” he said.

Unions have said they are committed to helping ­members with legitimate medical or ­religious exemptions and while they didn’t want to see termination of members, the large majority of their members are in support of the vaccinations.

Union leaders have also cited the Order in Council that made vaccination a condition of employment for public service employees. It was ordered Nov. 19 and was retroactive to Nov 1. It’s a regulation under the Public Service Act.

The Order in Council, ­however, serves to underscore Sheikh’s argument: “It’s not possible to have done this without consultation with the unions, which means that the unions would have agreed for a certain segment of their members to be discriminated against,” he said. “And so we’re bringing a claim against them.”

The B.C. Public Service Employees for Freedom, a group formed late last year in response to the public service vaccine mandate, cited an unnamed B.C. Corrections worker in the south-central Interior as saying the BCGEU had “abandoned” them and “sided with the NDP government on this vaccine mandate.”

The B.C. Public Service Agency said that as of April 20,

402 employees were either unvaccinated or refused to disclose their vaccination status as required under the COVID-19 vaccination policy and 31 terminations had taken place.

Meanwhile, there are two streams of vaccine ­mandate cases headed to B.C. Supreme Court: non-union ­members of Crown corporations making a “policy argument” against mandatory vaccination, and a group of public servants serving as petitioners making a judicial review Charter of Rights argument.

Non-union workers at Crown corporations including B.C. Hydro, B.C. Lottery Corp and B.C. Transit will file individual lawsuits against their employers claiming constructive dismissal and wrongful termination.

These employees were placed on unpaid leave and unable to access employment insurance with no redress, Sheikh said. “These people are literally ­bankrupt,” he said, adding that one of his B.C. Transit clients died by suicide.

In a separate lawsuit, 11 B.C. public servants will go to B.C. Supreme Court as part of a ­petition to fight the vaccine mandate, save their jobs and be compensated for their losses.

Court documents say the vaccine policy fundamentally altered the employees’ ­contract “without proper notice or ­agreement or their consent, in order to terminate them ­without any sort of due process or ­procedural fairness, for just cause.”

As well, employees can only request an exemption from the vaccine requirement based on a medical condition or other protected ground as defined under B.C’s Human Rights Code.

No exemption was provided, however, for freedom of ­conscience or security of the person under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, say court documents.

Additionally, Sheikh will argue the reasons for the ­two-dose vaccine mandate — to prevent transmission— no longer hold up as three doses is now the norm. Even vaccinated people can transmit COVID-19, and the mask and B.C. vaccine card mandates have been largely dropped.

The petitioners lost their bid in court for an injunction to hold off their firings until their case is heard in court in July. The petitioners were informed on April 14 that the terminations under the “Human Resources Policy 25 — COVID vaccination” could go ahead with 14 days’ notice.

The court filing says the vaccine mandate should be quashed. The mandate is expected to be in place until “public health concerns regarding COVID are reduced to a level, prescribed by government, to enable workplaces to operate without COVID-related restrictions.”
Cindy E. Harnett May 7, 2022 3:30 AM
Updated: May 7, 2022 5:02 AM

Shared from

Victoria News:
B.C. public servants head to court around
vaccine mandates that led to termination

Published by BCPS for Freedom Action Team on March 6, 2022

Umar Sheikh is the representing lawyer on behalf of nine B.C. public servants terminated due to non-compliance with provincial vaccination mandates. (Umar Sheikh/LinkedIn)

An action in B.C. Supreme Court has been filed by nine B.C. public servants – now facing termination – who refused to show proof of COVID-19 immunization following provincial government orders.

The petitioners are seeking an end to these terminations based on vaccination as a condition of their employment.

According to court documents obtained by Black Press Media, the petitioners say these policies fundamentally alter terms of employment contracts without proper notice, agreement or consent.

Due to a lack of procedural fairness, the regulation should be “quashed,” the action claims.

There were four petitioners that began the injunction and the number has since grown to nine – more people are expected to add their names in the days and weeks to come, said representing lawyer Umar Sheikh. A total of 400 B.C. public servants refused to disclose their vaccination status.

The original four petitioners include privacy officer Karine Bordua, senior manager for major projects Zoran Boskovic, former director of policy and stakeholder relations Philip Davidson and human resources service representative Clinton Chevrier.

Davidson was given a “final warning letter” on Jan. 17 indicating that his employment would be terminated on Feb. 23.

On Thursday (March 3) five more ­petitioners added their names: Emily Coburn, Caterina Bova, Brenda Johnson, Zorica ­Boskovic and Monica Maria ­Zuluaga, said Sheikh.

“It appears that we will be heading to court the week of March 21 to argue the injunction.”

Employees with up to 25 years of service are being fired without severance and only fully vaccinated employees are allowed to work from home and employees on leave without pay, including pregnant employees have been denied EI, Sheikh said.

“This move will cost the government millions of dollars in recruitment, rehiring, retraining and the loss of invaluable expertise,” he added. “We are currently working to add individuals to the petition who have fully complied with the policy as well.”

Shared from

Please Share

By admin

One thought on “BC Public Service Workers’ Lawyer: Unions Failed To Represent Them”

Comments are closed.